Legal Opinion
Nunez v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 29, 1984No. Appeal, No. 1075 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Palladino,
Samuel Nunez (Claimant) appeals here from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a decision of a referee denying benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1 We affirm.
The Board found the following facts. Claimant was employed as a jitney driver for more than three years, during which employment, the Employer’s policy required an employee to report an anticipated ab*622sence prior to the start of his shift. The Board found that this policy was to afford the Employer enough time to find a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Robinson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Gochenauer v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- McDermott v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richner v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Cassidy v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- BK Foods, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- S.E. Fee v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021