Legal Opinion

United States v. Marvin Joseph Lindsey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1989No. 88-5054PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

Marvin Lindsey pleaded guilty conditionally to possession of illegal firearms and destructive devices. He reserved the right to appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his home. Lindsey contends that the police lacked the requisite probable cause and exigent circumstances to secure his house without a warrant, that the police failed to knock and announce before entry, that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him, and that his consent to search was involuntarily given. He asks this court to set aside his conviction…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Juan Castillo, Aka: Luis Hong Rojas, United States of America v. Antonio De La RentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Charles M. Grossman, M.D. v. City of Portland, a Public Body, and Todd DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Hector Ramirez-JiminezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. StruckmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API