Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 22, 1895PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Palo Alto District Court. — HoN. George H. Care, Judge. This is an action at law to recover damages for certain alleged wrongful acts of the defendants^. There was a trial by jury. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKothrock, J.

I. The defendant T. H. Jackson was a justice of the peace, and C. B. Jackson was a special constable. A judgment for two dollars and seventy-five cents and costs was entered on the docket of said justice against E. B. Thompson,-plaintiff herein, and in favor of one Nolan. Execution was issued on the judgment, and it was served by C. B. Jackson, as special constable, by levying upon and selling certain hay in stack, the property of the defendant in execution. •This action was brought to recover damages of the defendants, on the ground that the judgment was void for want of jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Brooks v. ManganMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Henke v. McCordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Ormsby Bros. v. NolanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Auspach v. FergusonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Broom v. DouglassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Linder v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Shaw v. MoonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Rush v. BuckleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  5. Wilson v. LaphamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API