Legal Opinion
Long v. Dunlop Sports Group Americas, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 5, 2006No. C.A. No. 8:06-294-HMHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*521OPINION & ORDER
HERLONG, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the Plaintiffs and by Dunlop Sports Group Americas, Inc. a/k/a/ Dunlop Slazenger Group Americas, Inc. and Westminster Manufacturing, LLC a/k/a/ Dunlop Slazenger Manufacturing, LLC (collectively “Dunlop”) pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. After review, the court grants Dunlop’s motion for summary judgment and denies the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
I. Factual Background
The facts in this case are undisputed. On October 31, 2005, Dunlop…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Headrick v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Dingle v. Union City Chair Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- Long v. DUNLOP SPORTS GROUP AMERICAS INC.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006