State Ex Rel. State Bridge Commission v. Griffith
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The question in issue here concerns only the refunding bonds which the commission has authorized. There is express statutory authority found in the provisions of Section 1084-15cs, General Code, to permit the issuance of the bonds, if the statute is valid. It is not alleged that these proposed bonds are in any way defective in form or substance.
The first question concerns the right of the Secretary of State to raise the question of constitutionality of these statutes (Sections 1084-1 to 1084-17, General Code). Does he have such an interest in the execution of these bonds that he…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Public Institutional Building Authority v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Allen v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Burger v. Cleveland Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- Wayne Building & Loan Co. v. HooverOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Ohio Funds Management Board v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.