Legal Opinion

People v. Wilkes

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion for new trial on the ground that defendant was irregularly tried in his absence.

1Opinion of the Court

*106By the Court,

Barculo, Justice.

The affidavits show that the defendant was indicted in March last for publishing a libel upon Mr. Jordan late attorney general of the state; that he appeared and put in a plea of not guilty, by Mr. Dean his attorney, of this .county; that Mr. Dean was employed to watch and attend to the cause, and was present and assented to its being set down for the day on which it was tried. It further appears that the defendant had employed counsel in the city of New York to attend the trial, and that such counsel was prevented from attending by sickness, and that the counsel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. Doe, on the Demise of BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People of the State of N.Y. v. . GenetNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. People v. RedingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. State v. ConnersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. People v. GenetNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Metcalf v. BakerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API