Concrete, Inc. v. Rheaume Builders, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The plaintiff’s position is in effect that no constitutional amendment was adopted by the voters at the November 6, 1956, election which abolished the right to trial by jury in civil causes in which the value in controversy exceeds $100 as existed under Pt. I, Art. 20th, of the state Constitution. The question put to the electorate, as a result of the Constitutional Convention which convened in Concord on May 15, 1956, was as follows: “Are you in favor of preserving the right of trial by jury in civil causes in which the value in controversy exceeds five hundred dollars?” In response to this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Cummings v. EastmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- New Hampshire Municipal Trust Workers' Compensation Fund v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- City of Keene v. Gerry's Cash Market, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Securities Inv. Co. of St. Louis v. DonnelleyNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Perry v. WestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.