Ottawa Condensing Co. v. Dawkins
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Franklin district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Porter, J.:
The principal question to be determined is whether this is an action for relief on the ground of fraud. The plaintiff recovered a judgment. J. W. Reed, one of the defendants, appeals, and claims that the cause of action as alleged and proved was barred by the three-year statute of limitations. The petition alleges that in February, 1905, the defendants agreed to furnish and deliver to the plaintiff certain milk-condensing machinery at what it actually cost them; that the defendants did furnish the machinery, but *313falsely and fraudulently…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- State v. American Book Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Atchison Grain Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- John Deere Plow Co. v. WylandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Ryan v. Leavenworth, Atchison & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dalton v. Lawrence National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Bradrick v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Dalton v. Lawrence National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950