Legal Opinion

Ottawa Condensing Co. v. Dawkins

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1912No. 17,397PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Franklin district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The principal question to be determined is whether this is an action for relief on the ground of fraud. The plaintiff recovered a judgment. J. W. Reed, one of the defendants, appeals, and claims that the cause of action as alleged and proved was barred by the three-year statute of limitations. The petition alleges that in February, 1905, the defendants agreed to furnish and deliver to the plaintiff certain milk-condensing machinery at what it actually cost them; that the defendants did furnish the machinery, but *313falsely and fraudulently…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. State v. American Book Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Atchison Grain Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. John Deere Plow Co. v. WylandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Ryan v. Leavenworth, Atchison & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dalton v. Lawrence National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. Bradrick v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Dalton v. Lawrence National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API