Gayer v. Schlesinger
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1ConcurrenceLeventhal, Circuit Judge
(concurring) :*
I join in Judge Fahy’s opinion as the opinion of the court. It identifies key problems. My addition here relates to matters not discussed by Judge Fahy which I think may be pertinent.
The Government agreed that it was not relying on homosexuality as a reason per se, in and of itself, for denying tKe clearance requested.1 The applicant’s own public revelation avoids the usual blackmail threat, of disclosure of homosexuality, ordinarily relied upon as a reason for such denial. That does not necessarily end the inquiry, but it suffices to establish that if the agency seeks to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rittenour v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- In re KimballNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- In re KimballAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973