Legal Opinion

Panoulias v. Hawley

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided April 6, 1910Published

In Equity. Suits by Panayiotis Panoulias against John S. Hawley and Herman W. Hoops, against Adolph Ode and Dennis F. Gerbereux, against Henry Heide, and against Myron A. Smith, respectively. Qn motions for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, District Judge,

in this case I have read through all the affidavits and briefs, a matter of some length, and can see nothing which justifies my declining to follow the judgment in the action at law. After verdict in the same .circuit and the denial of a motion for a new trial, a judgment at law is nearly, if not quite, as conclusive as an interlocutory decree. Earl v. So. Pac. Co. (C. C.) 75 Fed. 609; Southern Pac. Co. v. Earl, 82 Fed. 690, 27 C. C. A. 185; Woodard v. Ellword G. & S. Co. (C. C.) 68 Fed. 717. Doubtless the persuasiveness of the judgment is not so great where it is in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. EarlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  3. American Paper Pail & Box Co. v. National Folding Box & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  4. Earl v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1896
  5. Woodard v. Ellwood Gas Stove & Stamping Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API