Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Yachnin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 5, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Final order unanimously reversed upon the law, with thirty dollars costs to appellant, and final order directed in favor of the landlord.

The lease was of the entire upper floor. It made no mention of any appurtenances. This would be immaterial if the hallway and stairs in question were the only means of access to it. In that case the right to use them would be implied as a way of necessity. Here, however, another means of access to the leased premises was provided. This, by the terms of the lease, was to be through a doorway to be cut by the tenant in the wall connecting the demised premises…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCullough v. Broad Exchange Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. McCullough v. . Broad Exchange CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Agate v. LowenbeinNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1871
  4. O'Beirne v. GildersleeveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Telesca v. M. L. Bruenn Co.New Rochelle City Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API