Legal Opinion

Cornish v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 9, 1974No. [No. 275, September Term, 1973.]PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.

The single issue before us is whether, under the particular circumstances of this criminal case, the retrial of the defendant-appellant following the trial judge’s sua sponte declaration of a mistrial would violate the double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

On August 18, 1972, the appellant Trent William Cornish was indicted by the Grand Jury of Baltimore City for the murder of one John Gerald Bullock. The indictment also charged Cornish with assault with intent to murder Bullock and with assault upon Bullock. The trial was originally scheduled…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Pulley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API