Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kater

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1991PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

We address for the third time the Commonwealth’s prosecution of James M. Kater for the murder of Mary Lou Arruda. The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree and kidnapping in 1979. In 1983, we reversed those convictions and remanded the case because the prosecution had introduced hypnotically-aided testimony. Commonwealth v. Kater, 388 Mass. 519 (1983) (Kater I). Preliminary to a retrial, an evidentiary hearing was held on the defendant’s motion to suppress all testimony of the witnesses who had been hypnotized. After hearing part of the evidence, the trial judge concluded that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. AmiraultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. BrittoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. FryarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. KaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API