Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Onan Corp.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided September 29, 2000No. IP 97-0814-C-H/GPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Like many employers in recent years, defendant Onan Corporation converted its defined benefit retirement plan to a design known as a “cash balance” design. In this case, Onan employees and retirees have raised a claim of age discrimination that could result in a finding that cash balance plans are essentially per.se illegal. The question is one of first impression in the courts: whether a cash balance defined benefit pension plan violates federal prohibitions on age discrimination in pension plans on the theory that the “rate of…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Campbell v. BankBoston, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Robinson v. City of Wichita Employees' Retirement Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
  4. Hirt v. Equitable Retirement Plan for Employees, Managers & AgentsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Richards v. Fleetboston Financial Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API