Legal Opinion
Campbell v. BankBoston, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 7, 2003No. 02-1695PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
At the heart of this case is the debate over cash balance pension plans, a new type of plan that favors, in many cases, younger workers over those closer to re tirement age. The plaintiff, James W. Campbell, is a former employee of Bank-Boston, a business that switched from a traditional defined benefit plan to a cash balance system. He sued, alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (2000), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. We affirm the district court’s entry of summary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Franchina v. Providence Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Guzmán-Rosario v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Ruiz-Sulsona v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.