Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arnold v. Mayal Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 1948Published

1DissentDore, J.

The facts are accurately stated in the prevailing opinion and need not be repeated.

The rule formerly was that a motion was “ made ”, not when the notice of motion was served, but on the return date in court *4(Low v. Bankers Trust Company, 265 N. Y. 264; Watkins v. Pacific Finance Co., 259 App. Div. 685). But in 1941, section 113 of the Civil Practice Act was amended (L. 1941, ch. 266) so as to add the following sentence: “ A motion is made when a notice thereof or an order to show cause is duly served.”

The motion herein was made January 22, 1947, on the last day of the two-year Statute of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Van Der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. People Ex Rel. Northchester Corp. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Jackson ex dem. Bleecker v. WiseburnNew York Supreme Court · 1830

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API