Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Binswanger & Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 29, 1921PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Certified question from the Industrial Commission pursuant to the provisions of section 61 of the workmen's compensation act (Acts 1918 p. 637).

1Per curiam

The Industrial Commission, pursuant to the provisions of section 61 of the workmen’s compensation act (Acts 1918, page 637), has certified to us a question which is presented 'as follows:

“The claimant, Alvin Taylor, was, on the 21st day of January, 1921, and had for some time prior thereto been, employed by the defendant, Binswanger & Company, at its' glass factory in the city of Richmond. The claimant is a boy a little over fifteen years of age. He was employed as an office boy, and among other duties incident to his employment, did errands for his employer. The employees were allowed one…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. California C. I. Exch. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Dreyfus & Co. v. MeadeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Honaker & Feeney v. HartleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  5. Prince v. Pan American World AirwaysCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API