Legal Opinion
United States v. Giacalone
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 19, 1980No. (S) 80 Cr. 123 (RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Joseph “Joey” Arnao (date of birth 8/3/41) 1 has moved to suppress a statement he gave to agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on July 10, 1980. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
Two indictments were returned in this case. The first, filed on February 26,1980, charged three named defendants, Joey Arnao’s present co-defendants, and a fourth defendant identified only as “John Doe a/k/a ‘Joey’ ” with certain of the offenses outlined above. After the return of that indictment, F.B.I. agents engaged in further investigation aimed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Lionel MohabirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Reginald SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- United States v. Calvin Demonsier ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- United States v. GiacaloneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- People v. GriffithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.