Legal Opinion

Harris v. Rose's Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1993No. 2042PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

Pamela Harris brought these wrongful death and survival actions under a products liability theory against the respondent Rose’s Stores, Inc. Harris alleges a fire in her home that caused the death of her minor son, Aaron Harris, resulted from a defective ceiling fan that Rose’s sold to Harris’ landlord, the defendant Edgar Gregory. The trial court granted rose’s motion for summary judgment on Harris’ claim and on a cross claim asserted by Gregory against Rose’s. Harris appeals. We affirm. 1

Harris contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Rose’s because she…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Madden v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Crocker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Smith v. T.H. Snipes & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Seaside Resorts, Inc. v. Club Car, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Anderson Ex Rel. Estate of McLees v. Green Bull, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Nguyen v. Uniflex Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Anderson Ex Rel. Estate of McLees v. Green Bull, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Eichin v. Covidien LPDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API