Legal Opinion

Zak v. Riffel

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 15, 2005No. 91,946PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

Kathleen S. Zak filed a medical negligence case seeking damages for the wrongful death of her husband, Michael Zak, a 48-year-old business executive, from dilated cardiomyopathy. The case proceeded to trial against only Dr. Lawrence D. Riffel. The jury returned a verdict finding Dr. Riffel to be 51% at fault and Michael to be 49% at fault. The jury awarded $100,000 in total damages. The primaiy issue we will address on appeal is whether the trial court erred by giving an instruction which allowed the jury to allocate fault to Michael because of his “obesity and lifestyle.” We will…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. Farley v. EngelkenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. State v. MarshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Beck v. Kansas Adult AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martinez v. MILBURN ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Odom v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Haley ex rel. Haley v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  4. Apodaca v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017
  5. Barron v. WehnerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API