Legal Opinion
Danner v. Himmelfarb
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1988No. 87-6021PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
The district court granted summary judgment against Vincent E. Davis on his federal securities law claim and dismissed his state law claims against Henry Himmel-farb, Charles T. Hays, Richard A. Edwards, Golden Arrow Gas Energy Corp. (“GAGE”), Jim Kitchens, Ronald G. Miller, Thomas E. Stepp, the law firm of Rutan & Tucker, Robert Pike, Empire Equities (“Empire”) and Ronald Garrett. The district court concluded that Empire’s promissory note given to Davis in exchange for $400,000 worth of pesos 1 was not a “security” within the meaning of the federal securities…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Lothschuetz v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- King Fisher Marine Service, Inc. v. 21st Phoenix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.