Legal Opinion

In Re BC

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 8, 1999No. 98-341Published

1Opinion of the Court

726 A.2d 45 (1999)

In re B.C.

No. 98-341.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

January 8, 1999.

Michael Rose, St. Albans, for appellant Custodial Guardian.

Charles S. Martin of Martin & Associates, Barre, for appellant Mother.

William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, Montpelier, and Jody A. Racht and Martha E. Csala, Assistant Attorneys General, Waterbury, for appellee.

Present AMESTOY, C.J., and DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.

MORSE, J.

Mother and grandmother of four-year-old B.C. appeal the family court's order terminating their parental rights. They argue that the family court lacked jurisdiction over…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. In Re DenioSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. In re B.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. In re G. F.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Williams v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API