Legal Opinion

State v. Londo

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 6, 2006No. 1 CA-CR 05-1190, 1 CA-CR 05-1191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OROZCO, Judge.

¶ 1 Defendant Tommy Earl Londo (Defendant) appeals his conviction for sale or transfer of narcotic drugs on the ground that his admission he swallowed crack cocaine was obtained involuntarily and/or in violation of his Miranda 1 rights. We hold that Defendant’s statements were not obtained in violation of Miranda and the trial court did not err by admitting his confession. We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v. Guerra, 161 Ariz. 289, 293, 778 P.2d 1185, 1189 (1989). On July 21, 2004, Defendant was arrested as part of an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. GuerraArizona Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. State of Arizona v. Glenn Wendell BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API