Legal Opinion
Arredondo v. Nodelman
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edwin Kassoff, J.
In 1991 several ova were removed from Luz Arredondo and *758fertilized in vitro with the sperm of her husband, petitioner Andres Arredondo. The fertilized ova were then implanted into the uterus of respondent Judith Nodelman. At the time of the implantation, respondent Nodelman was married and she and her husband signed affidavits stating that the Arredondos are the biological parents of the fertilized eggs which were implanted in Judith Nodelman and consenting to the Arredondos’ entitlement to a declaration of their parental right over the resulting children.
R…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Culliton v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- T.V. v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re SebastianNew York Surrogate's Court · 2009
- Doe v. Board of HealthNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- In re DoeNew York Surrogate's Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.