Legal Opinion
Doe v. Board of Health
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 19, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*425OPINION OF THE COURT
Jane S. Solomon, J.
This is an action for declaratory relief whereby the biological parents of newborn triplets, who were carried by a gestational surrogate, join with the gestational surrogate and her husband in seeking a judgment that the biological parents’ names should appear on the children’s birth certificates.
Dick Doe and Jane Doe are husband and wife, as are Dick Roe and Jane Roe. Mrs. Doe and Mrs. Roe are sisters. Mrs. Doe is unable to bear children because her uterus was removed as a result of cancer. Her sister agreed to the implantation in her uterus of embryos…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- A.H.W. v. G.H.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Arredondo v. NodelmanNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Andres A. v. Judith N.New York City Family Court · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- T.V. v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Dickerson v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re SebastianNew York Surrogate's Court · 2009
- In re the Estate of GaynorNew York Surrogate's Court · 2006
- In Re CKGTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.