Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Meyer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2018No. 7259 S-16176PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Landowners sued their neighbors over use of a well and an access easement, and the neighbors counterclaimed for damages caused by interference with their water rights and loss of access to their cabin. The superior court ruled in favor of the neighbors following trial and awarded them compensatory loss-of-use damages, as well as full attorney's fees based in part on a finding that the landowners had engaged in vexatious and bad faith conduct. The landowners appeal. We conclude that the superior court did not clearly err in the findings underlying its damages…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Conam Alaska v. Bell Lavalin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Holmes v. RaffoWashington Supreme Court · 1962

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dwane J. Sykes v. Jay T. Lawless and Jeannie L. EnglishAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Lance Pruitt v. State of Alaska, Division of Elections, and Lt. Gov. Kevin Meyer and Director Gail Fenumiai, in their Official Capacities and Elizabeth Hodges Snyder, IntervenorAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. David A. Bragg and Rhetta K. Bragg v. Timothy TeslowAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. David A. Bragg and Rhetta K. Bragg v. Timothy TeslowAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Frank Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API