Legal Opinion

Phillips Brothers, Division of Engelhard Mineral & Chemical Co., and Derby & Co., Inc. v. Locust Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1985No. 84-1361PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, Phillips Brothers and Derby, appeal from the granting of motions for summary judgment by defendant, Locust Industries, Inc. Locust Industries is a warehouseman which acted as a bailee for two separate shipments of nickel owned by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs brought this action for negligence, breach of contract, and conversion after Locust discovered that portions of each shipment had been stolen. The trial judge granted Locust’s motions for summary judgment on all three causes of action. We affirm.

I

Plaintiffs were the bailors of 268 pallets of nickel briquettes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Educ., Garrett Co. v. LendoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Strom International, Ltd. v. Spar Warehouse & Distributors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Refrigeration Sales Co. v. Mitchell-Jackson, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Upjohn Company v. TimpanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Refrigeration Sales Co., Inc. v. Mitchell-Jackson, Inc., a Corporation, and Alfred L. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Coutinho & Ferrostaal Inc. v. M/V Federal RhineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API