Legal Opinion

Coutinho & Ferrostaal Inc. v. M/V Federal Rhine

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 29, 2011No. Civil JFM-08-2222PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.

On August 26, 2008, Plaintiff Coutinho and Ferrostaal, Inc. (“Ferrostaal”) filed a complaint against M/V Federal Rhine, Daewoo Logistics Corporation, Federal Atlantic Limited, Beacon Stevedoring Corporation, and the Rukert Terminals Corporation (“Rukert”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, alleging negligent transportation, handling, and storage of the steel pipe cargo on board the vessel M/V Federal Rhine. Ferrostaal seeks $350,000.00 in compensatory damages. Now pending before this Court is Rukert’s Second Motion for Declaratory Judgment, in which…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  2. COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Ind-Com Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  4. Goodman v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Potomac Investment Properties, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Waters v. Delaware Moving and Storage, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API