Legal Opinion

Sabinal Nat. Bank v. Bryant

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1920No. 128-3015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Fourth Supreme Judicial District. Suit by the Sabinal National Bank against Albert Bryant, Sr., and others. There was a judgment for the defendants, which was affirmed on appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals (191 S. W. 1179), and the plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

• SADDER, P. J.

This suit was brought in the district court of Uvalde county, Tex., by the Sabinal National Bank, as plaintiff, against Albert Bryant, Sr., A. J. Kessler, and O. B. Kessler, upon two grounds; for recovery upon two notes^ for $800 and $700 each, against all of the defendants, or for the recovery against the defendants as for conversion of the amount of said two notes alleged ■to have been paid to and converted by A. J. & O. B. Kessler, and upon which fund plaintiffs had a lien. The findings of fact by the trial court show the nature of the suit. He finds that the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Sabinal Nat. Bank v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Excel Finance Camp, Inc. v. TannerhillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. First Nat. Bank of Lansing v. PadjenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Prudential Finance Plan of N. O., La., Inc. v. NecaiseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API