Legal Opinion
Prudential Finance Plan of N. O., La., Inc. v. Necaise
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 5, 1966No. 2358PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASEZ, Judge.
This is a suit on a promissory note secured by a chattel mortgage on several items of household furniture and appliances that were the property of the defendant, Esther (Eather) Necaise.
The petition of the plaintiff, Prudential Finance Plan of N.O., La., Inc., alleges that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $422.00, plus 20 per cent attorney’s fees and 8 per cent interest, she having defaulted on several installments of the note for $480.00, which contained an acceleration clause and provision for attorney’s fees.
*869The issue presented to the trial court was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Schexnailder v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Excel Finance Camp, Inc. v. TannerhillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Heyerdale v. HanemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Sabinal Nat. Bank v. BryantTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thorp Credit & Thrift Co. v. Pommerer (In Re Pommerer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- X-L Finance Co. v. OlivierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Credit Plan, Inc. v. DomingueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Electronic Credit Corp. v. FairbanksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Peters v. Zoda (In re Zoda)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1980