Commonwealth v. Smith
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of McKean County granting appellee’s motion in limine with regard to the exclusion of testimony about appellee’s sexual offenses against his oldest daughter, Mona Smith Novak. We hold that the court below abused its discretion in excluding the aforesaid testimony, and we, thus, reverse that ruling.
Upon review of the record, we find that the Commonwealth has certified that the order in question substantially handicaps its prosecution. Hence, we have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. ClaypoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TysonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. LauroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. EinhornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. LuktischSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.