Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Sun L. Ins. Co. of America

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1930No. Appeal 176PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Whitmore, J.,

This,was an action instituted by Florence May Shoemaker, by her father and nest friend, against the Sun Life Insurance Company to recover on a policy of insurance issued to the husband of the plaintiff. A rule was made absolute requiring the claimant and Mrs. Rose Shoemaker to interplead as to the subject matter of the action.

On July 12, 1927 the Sun Life Insurance Company of America issued a policy of insurance on the life of John Shoemaker (husband of the plaintiff) in the sum of $1,500 and the policy was in force at the time of his death on March 15, 1928. Florence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grant v. FairesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Estate of K.I. Sanes. (No. 1.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Herrod v. KimbroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Riley v. WirthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ReichDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Cody v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Stoll v. Boyle (Casserly)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Fornera's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API