Legal Opinion
Lamport Co. v. Tepper
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 7, 1943No. 2339PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff instituted suit against the defendant on a guaranty entered into between the plaintiff, defendant, and third party defendant. Plaintiff did not elect to sue the third party defendant, who is in court on the complaint filed against her by the defendant-third party plaintiff. Motion is made to vacate the order granting leave to the defendant-third party plaintiff to bring in the third party defendant on the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.
Pursuant to Rule 14(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. A. following section…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thompson v. CranstonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1942
- Southern Surety Co. v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Calvery v. Peak Drilling Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1954
- Mitchell v. Duquesne Brewing Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. FabreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Combs v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1944