Legal Opinion
Southern Surety Co. v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 6, 1929No. 3944PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
In the court below, the Commercial 'Casualty Insurance Company moved the court, and its motion was granted, to dismiss the bill brought by the Southern Surety Company and the National Surety Company, against it. Thereupon the latter companies took this appeal. The ease was fully discussed, and the reasons which led that court to dismiss the bill are fully discussed in its opinion, which is printed in the margin. 1 Finding ourselves in accord therewith, said opinion is adopted as expressive of our views, and the decree is affirmed. Conn. 459, 26 A. 352, 21 L. R. A. 247; Turk v. Newark Fire…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bulkeley v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Newark Fire Ins. Co. v. TurkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- Meigs v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Scruggs v. American Cent. Ins. Co. of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1910
- King v. Lancaster County Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. Associated Retail Credit Men of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Pelelas v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Car & General InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation. The Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Home for Crippled Children v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.