Legal Opinion

Curb v. Stewart, Adams & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 4, 1926No. 2 Div. 902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This is the second appeal. 210 Ala. 341, 98 So. 24. The case was tried by the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff.

It is uncontradicted that the defendant bought the paint under a warranty that it would stand for seven or eight years. This presupposed that it be properly applied. Defendant’s evidence is wanting in the proof that the same was properly applied, that is, in a skillful and workmanlike manner.

The plaintiff’s demurrer to the plea, setting up a breach of the warranty for that it is not averred that the paint was not applied in a skillful and workmanlike…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bingham v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  2. Curb v. Stewart, Adams & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. House of Van Praag, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Van Antwerp-Aldridge Drug Co. v. SchwarzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Byars v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API