Crawford-Thomas v. State

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to a jury trial, Janice Crawford-Thomas was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol, driving left of the centerline, and speeding. She appeals, arguing that the trial court erroneously denied her motion to suppress evidence. The argument is without merit, so we affirm her convictions.

In reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we must construe the evidence most favorably to uphold the trial court’s judgment.1 The trial court’s findings of fact are analogous to a jury verdict and we may not disturb them if there is any evidence to…