Central Lithographing & Engraving Co. v. Moore
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Winnebago County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOrton, J.
By two certain written agreements, one dated September 15, and the other November 2, 1885, the plaintiff agreed to manufacture a large quantity of engravings and lithographs for theatrical purposes, for the defendant and for his special use, to be taken and paid for during the *171theatrical season of 1885-86, and all of the work was to be completed and ready for delivery by the 15th day of December, 1885. A large portion of the goods were taken and paid for during the theatrical season above stated, and the remainder was ready for delivery by the 15th day of December, 1885, and during that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Todd v. Dowd's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Goddard v. BinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Ganson v. MadiganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Meincke v. FalkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Mead v. CaseNew York Supreme Court · 1860
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beck & Pauli Lithographing Co. v. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
- Washington Printing & Binding Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Agnew v. BaldwinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. EpsteanNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1918
- Wright v. C. S. Graves Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.