Bean v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
Plaintiffs sue for the taking by defendant of rights they claim in the waters of the Rio Grande River. Their properties lie in the Hudspeth County Conservation and Reclamation District No. 1 (hereinafter called Hudspeth District). This district adjoins the El Paso District to the north, which El Paso District is a part of defendant’s Rio Grande irrigation project.
The case comes before us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the limited question as to whether or not the plaintiffs have any water rights with respect to the waters of the Rio Grande River which have been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ide v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ronald Miller v. Robert W. JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Hudspeth County Conservation & Reclamation Dist. No. 1 v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goshen Irrigation District v. Pathfinder Irrigation DistrictDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1999
- Hunter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Qwest Corp. v. Elephant Butte Irrigation DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008