Legal Opinion

Goshen Irrigation District v. Pathfinder Irrigation District

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided June 24, 1999No. 2:89-cv-00161Published

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ALAN B. JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

I

Water is the life-blood of Wyoming and Nebraska, arid Western states. Consequently, they, like the rest of the West, were transformed by the Bureau of Reclamation’s epic water storage projects. The question raised in this ease is whether the irrigation districts of the Bureau’s North Platte River Project have priority to the use of water stored in Pathfinder Reservoir in a drought year.

The drought year in question is 1989. The water rights in question arise under contracts for water stored in reservoirs built by the federal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API