Legal Opinion

In Re Sanborn

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 20, 1893No. 11PublishedCited by 74 opinions

original. The casé is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shiras

A claim of John B. Sanborn, presented in the Department - of the Interior, for certain fees under a contract with Sisseton and Wahpeton Indians, of ten per cent of the amount appropriated for said Indians by section 27 of the Indian Appropriation Act of March 3,1891, 26 Stat. 989, c. 543, was referred by the Secretary of that Department, with the consent of the claimant, to the Court of Claims, in pursuance of § 12 of the act of March 3, 1887,.24 Stat. 505, c. 359; 1 Sup. Hev. Stat. 2d ed. 561. That court having concluded that Sanborn was not entitled to recover, and having reported its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. FerreiraSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. United States v. O'GradySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  5. United States v. AlireSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API