Legal Opinion

State v. . Rogers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Cooke, J., March Term, 1914, of Wake.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

The defendant was convicted on an indictment for “willfully and feloniously setting fire to a certain ginhouse, the property of W. B. Hopkins, with intent to burn and destroy the same.” S. v. Purdie, 67 N. C., 25; S. v. Pierce, 123 N. C., 745. The indictment was sufficient both under Revisal, 333.6 and 3341, and it was immaterial under which, as the punishment inflicted was within the limits prescribed for either. Revisal, 3336, covers a willful attempt to burn a “cotton gin,” which from the context evidently means the same thing as a “ginhouse.” Eevisal, 3341, makes punishable the willful…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Arrowood v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. State v. . RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. State v. . LytleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. State v. MaultsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. S. v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. State v. . SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Arrowood v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API