Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. McCollum

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1932No. Docket No. Crim. 3487PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Appellant was charged by separate counts in an information (No. 2431) with the crimes of rape and incest committed on his own sixteen year old daughter. By a separate information (No. 2432) he was charged with sex perversion practiced on the same child, a violation of. section 288a of the Penal Code. The jury returned verdicts of guilty on the charges of incest and sex perversion, and not guilty on the charge of rape. From the judg meats of conviction and orders denying his motions for a new trial the defendant appealed.

•The conviction on the charge of incest was affirmed (People v. McCollum,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. McCollumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Kelley v. CochranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. McRaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. TobiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. People v. BrocklehurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API