Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1892No. 501PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNew, J.

The appellant was indicted under the first clause of section 1994, R. S. 1881. That section reads as follows:

■ “ Whoever keeps a house of ill-fame, resorted to for the purpose of prostitution or lewdness; or knowingly lets a house to be so kept; or knowingly permits a house which he has let to be so kept, — shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars nor less than ten dollars, to which may be added imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months.”

There was a trial by jury and verdict of guilty, fixing the punishment at $25. Judgment was rendered upon the verdict over a motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Betts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. State v. BrunellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kissel v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Putman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Schultz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  5. Pastime v. State ex rel. PowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API