Whitlock v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Sullivan Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNew, J.
The appellant was indicted under the first clause of section 1994, R. S. 1881. That section reads as follows:
■ “ Whoever keeps a house of ill-fame, resorted to for the purpose of prostitution or lewdness; or knowingly lets a house to be so kept; or knowingly permits a house which he has let to be so kept, — shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars nor less than ten dollars, to which may be added imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months.”
There was a trial by jury and verdict of guilty, fixing the punishment at $25. Judgment was rendered upon the verdict over a motion…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Betts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. BrunellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kissel v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Putman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Schultz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Pastime v. State ex rel. PowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.