Schultz v. State

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted in the Lake Criminal Court of keeping a “house of ill-fame” (§2562 Burns 1926), and judgment followed. Appellant’s motion for a new trial specifying causes-— verdict contrary to law and not sustained by sufficient evidence; the admission of certain testimony over appellant’s objection, and the court’s refusal to strike it out— was overruled and this ruling is assigned as error.

Our conclusion, after having carefully examined the record and briefs of counsel for appellant is, that the verdict is contrary to law only in case it is not sustained by…