Legal Opinion

Ward v. First Nat. Bank of Hartford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 12, 1932No. 4 Div. 636PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellee (plaintiff in the court below) is engaged in the banking business at Hartford, Geneva county, Ala., having been organized under the laws of the United States.

The assessment for taxes on the shares of stock in the bank for the year 1930 amounted to $1,096.18, and the tax collector demanded payment, threatening a levy if not paid. On May 4, 1931, the attorney for the bank tendered the amount due, protesting at the time that it was illegal, and serving on the collector a protest in writing which also gave notice that suit would at once be instituted for its recovery. The collector…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Des Moines National Bank v. FairweatherSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. First Nat. Bank of Guthrie Center v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nachman v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. City of Prichard v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. First Nat. Bank of Scottsboro v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Title Guarantee Loan & Trust Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Merchants Despatch Transportation Corp. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API