Legal Opinion

People v. Stanley

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 2017No. Court of Appeals 16CA1612PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE FREYRE

¶ 1 In this prosecution, appeal of a restitution setoff, we must reconcile the dual policy interests underlying the restitution statute, § 18-1.3-603, C.R.S. 2016, of fully compensating -a victim on the one hand and of, precluding double recovery by the victim on the other.

¶ 2 The prosecution asks us to reverse the trial court’s order awarding the defendant, Steven Robert Paul Stanley, a $25,000 setoff against restitution of $30,000, an amount paid to the victim by the Crime Victim Compensation Program (CVCP). The setoff arose from a policy-limits settlement between the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ad Two, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Copper Mountain, Inc. v. Industrial Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  3. Abarca v. People No. 13SC750, Hill v. People No. 14SC3, Medrano-Bustamante v. People No. 14SC7, People v. SmootsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. People v. SmootsColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MadisonColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. v. GregoryColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. People in the Interest of A.VColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API