People v. Stanley
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE FREYRE
¶ 1 In this prosecution, appeal of a restitution setoff, we must reconcile the dual policy interests underlying the restitution statute, § 18-1.3-603, C.R.S. 2016, of fully compensating -a victim on the one hand and of, precluding double recovery by the victim on the other.
¶ 2 The prosecution asks us to reverse the trial court’s order awarding the defendant, Steven Robert Paul Stanley, a $25,000 setoff against restitution of $30,000, an amount paid to the victim by the Crime Victim Compensation Program (CVCP). The setoff arose from a policy-limits settlement between the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ad Two, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Copper Mountain, Inc. v. Industrial Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Abarca v. People No. 13SC750, Hill v. People No. 14SC3, Medrano-Bustamante v. People No. 14SC7, People v. SmootsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- People v. SmootsColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. MadisonColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- v. GregoryColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- People in the Interest of A.VColorado Court of Appeals · 2018