Ireland v. Matthews
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
Regardless of the question as to whether the defendant’s counter-affidavits were timely, the motion for summary judgment was properly overruled since the plaintiff failed to show he was entitled to recover as a matter of law.
Code Ann. § 81A-156 (e) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 660; 1967, pp. 226, 238) ■ provides: “Supporting and opposing affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in the evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein.” The plaintiff in his affidavit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Smith v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
3Cited by9 opinions
- Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Sullivan v. FabeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Wynn v. AriasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Georgia Ports Authority v. NORAIR ENGINEERING CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Borden, Inc. v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.