Legal Opinion

Heisig v. Vaughan Gardner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1929No. 3644PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

This is an action by the defendant in error to recover the sum of $241.-23, with interest and attorney’s fees, due upon a paving certificate issued by the city of Longview, and to foreclose a special tax lien on a lot situated on Methvin street of that city. The facts found and filed by the judge before whom the case was tried are, in substance, as follows:

In August, 1919, the city of Longview determined to pave Methvin street, and thereafter adopted the necessary resolutions, ordinance, and other proceedings required by its charter and the law of the state to authorize the assessment of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frith v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Uvalde Co. v. TribbleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Caswell v. Lensing & BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spencer v. MaverickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Lubbock Independent School Dist. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Johnson v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. BD. OF ADJUST. OF CITY OF SAN ANTONIO v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. City of Dallas v. CoffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API