Legal Opinion

Jersey Urban Renewal, LLC v. City of Asbury Park

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 5, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court is delivered by

CONLEY, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff, owner of a dilapidated apartment building in defendant City of Asbury Park’s Waterfront Redevelopment Zone,1 applied to defendant Planning Board for site plan approval of proposed renovation of the building. Defendant Asbury Park and intervenor Asbury Partners, LLC, the designated Redevelopment Master Developer, objected, contending that under the City’s Redevelopment Plan and the City’s Agreement with intervenor, plaintiff was required to, but did not, obtain (1) status as a subsequent developer, (2) approval of the Technical…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tp. of Dover v. Bd. of Adj. of Tp. of DoverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. EC, LLC v. Planning Bd. of EastamptonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  3. Hirth v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Britwood Urban v. City of AsburyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  5. TWC REALTY PARTNER. v. Zoning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weeden v. City CouncilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  2. Milford Mill 128, LLC v. Borough of MilfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  3. Route 440 Developers, LLC v. Planning Board of the City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API