Legal Opinion
Hirth v. City of Hoboken
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 15, 2001PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
766 A.2d 803 (2001)
337 N.J. Super. 149
Mitchell HIRTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF HOBOKEN, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 24, 2000.
Decided February 15, 2001.
Richard Seltzer, Hoboken, argued the cause for appellant.
Linda Sabat argued the cause for respondent (Murray, Murray & Corrigan, attorneys; Ms. Sabat, of counsel and on the brief; William E. Denver, on the brief).
Before Judges SKILLMAN, CONLEY and LESEMANN.
The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.
This appeal involves a challenge to a City of Hoboken ordinance which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Elizabeth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Ward v. KeenanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Levin v. Tp. Committee of Tp. of BridgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- SMB Associates v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Six Month Extension of NJACNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRoseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Concerned Citizens v. MayorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- In re RodriguezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Jennings v. Borough of HighlandsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.